Anonymous on Value for money? ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
The hurdle of disbelief: Sitting at a swank gathering last evening (a fundraiser for a Jewish school which featured Elie Wiesel as the keynote speaker), I got to talking, as I am wont to do, about the greatest threat facing Canadian society. No, not al Qaeda sleeper cells. No, not Celine Dion. It’s the cockamamie kangaroo court system that has jettisoned 800 years of British Common Law in favour of Marxist mumbo jumbo and enforced groupthink—George Orwell by way of Alice in Wonderland by way of Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon. Over dinner I tried to explain to my tablemates how it worked.
“So the Ontario Human Rights Commission can come into your home without warning or a warrant, go through your things, take away whatever it wants, and use it against you in a “court” where there’s no presumption of innocence, the truth is irrelevant, and the verdict is always guilty. Oh, and you’re on the hook for all your legal fees, while the person who complained doesn’t have to pay a dime.”
From the looks on their faces I could see they thought I had taken complete leave of my senses and made up the whole thing.
It occurs to me that that’s likely to be the biggest impediment to getting rid of this ridiculous system—the fact that people simply cannot fathom that HRCs/tribunals actually have the power to do what they do.
