Anonymous on Value for money? ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Elmo’s warm-up: Prior to lodging official complaints about Maclean’s magazine’s purported “Islamophobia” to several of our nations august panels of officious busy-bodies, the CIC’s Mo Elmasry got in some practice by complaining to the Ontario Press Council. The subject of his complaint: a column in the Toronto Star by Rosie DiManno, the paper’s token non-loon, on the occasion of the assassination of the founder of genocidal terror outfit Hamas. Mo and his co-complainant, Hajara Kutty, said the entire column was “racist and wilfully promoted hatred against Arabs,” but, in particular, they objected to this passage:
The Arab world is in acute lamentation over Yassin’s extermination, which says a lot about what passes for leadership in societies infused with choler, where wickedness is bred in the bone, and where the very idea of Israel as a sovereign state, with the right to exist, is anathema. Yassin was an arch-terrorist by any definition of the term, a viper in a wheelchair, and if his murder is now inducing shrill promises of revenge from radical groups that actually have little use for each other, sharing only an irreversible enmity for Israel, then it only underscores how depraved some societies have become, how far they have slithered away from even the most basic respect for human life.
The phrase that really sent them into a tizzy was the one about wickedness being “bred in the bone.” They claimed that the concept of hatred been passed from one generation to the next is inherently “racist”. They were also distressed by the word “extermination,” which they said compounded the “racism”.
The Ontario Press Council, not unexpectedly, caved. It held that, while DiManno was certainly entitled to her opinions, that’s fer shure (or words to that effect),
it considers such words as “bred in the bone” to be denigration of a whole society and that some of the language crosses the line between acceptable and unacceptable comment and is unnecessarily hurtful.
The complaint was upheld, the requisite apologies were made, and, several years later, the man with the “hurt” feelings felt confident enough to take on Maclean’s.
