Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
“Hate speech” in the Globe: Under the terms of the anti-hate speech sections of our federal, provincial and territorial human rights acts—which, for the moment, override our fundamental Charter right of free expression—the truth is irrelevant if it has the potential to expose an identifiable group to “hatred” at some unspecified point in the future. In light of that legistlation, how can the Globe and Mail justify its report about Ottawa lad Mohammad Momin Khawaja, who is said to have “lived for jihad” (hey, who doesn’t?)? Khawaja is in the dock for his alleged involvement with some British home-growners who apparently wanted to take their paintball training to the next level by slicing and dicing real live kafirs:
OTTAWA -- Mohammad Momin Khawaja thought of little else but holy war, an Ottawa court heard yesterday.
As the trial of the first man charged under Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act got under way four years after police raided his home in the Ottawa suburb of Orleans, the Crown gave a two-hour summary of its case, in which it will present dozens - perhaps hundreds - of intercepted conversations to show that the accused admitted he had a one-track mind. Mr. Khawaja, the court was told, wrote that "that devotion to the effort of jihad is part of me" and said that not a day went by in which he didn't want to join the mujahedeen, or holy warriors.
He also allegedly said, "The kuffar [infidels] are treacherous and understand only death and destruction."
The Crown alleges Mr. Khawaja, now 29, was involved in a trans-Atlantic conspiracy dating back to two years before his arrest in 2004. It is alleged that he met fellow extremists in London and learned at a training camp in Pakistan how to fire AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades. He is accused of trying to build a remote-controlled detonation device for a British cell that wanted to attack civilian targets in London, including possibly a night club and power grids.
Prosecutors said yesterday that Mr. Khawaja was so deep into the idea of holy war that even his attempts at marriage foundered after he told a prospective bride she had to understand he was "down with J" - or armed jihad, battles aimed at changing world governments or, at the very least, securing martyrdom for himself.
The Crown also said he was caught wiring funds to terrorist co-conspirators through a female friend selected because, as Mr. Khawaja wrote to her, "sisters don't get caught, brothers, if they send money, they get caught."
As the charges were read, the soft-spoken Mr. Khawaja, shaven and with long hair parted in the middle, said "not guilty" seven times, responding to each charge against him.
Members of his family, who have frequently accused the RCMP of building a racist case, sat in the courtroom in silence. Counterterrorism experts and international journalists looked on with interest, as the trial promises to provide insight into both radicalization and the incestuous nature of international jihadi schemes…
“Jihad”? “Kuffars”? “Mujahedeen”? Isn’t it, um, Islamophobic to mention such things? Won’t it just make the disaffected young lads even angrier, resulting in even more plots of this nature?
If I were Khurrum Awan, I’d give serious consideration to lodging a complaint with one or more of Canada’s anti-hate bodies, because this type of report is likely to expose Muslims to far more “Islamophobia” than anything ever penned by Mark Steyn.
