...born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad

About me

User: scaramouche
Irreverent, contrarian, delighted to be out of synch with the zeitgeist, I depend on my sense of humour (such as it is) to keep me sane in this wacky world.

  • Contact me
  • My profile
  • Linkme

Counter

visited *loading* times

Tuesday, 24 June 2008

“Hate speech” in the Globe: Under the terms of the anti-hate speech sections of our federal, provincial and territorial human rights acts—which, for the moment, override our fundamental Charter right of free expression—the truth is irrelevant if it has the potential to expose an identifiable group to “hatred” at some unspecified point in the future. In light of that legistlation, how can the Globe and Mail justify its report about Ottawa lad Mohammad Momin Khawaja, who is said to have “lived for jihad” (hey, who doesn’t?)? Khawaja is in the dock for his alleged involvement with some British home-growners who apparently wanted to take their paintball training to the next level by slicing and dicing real live kafirs:

OTTAWA -- Mohammad Momin Khawaja thought of little else but holy war, an Ottawa court heard yesterday.

As the trial of the first man charged under Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act got under way four years after police raided his home in the Ottawa suburb of Orleans, the Crown gave a two-hour summary of its case, in which it will present dozens - perhaps hundreds - of intercepted conversations to show that the accused admitted he had a one-track mind. Mr. Khawaja, the court was told, wrote that "that devotion to the effort of jihad is part of me" and said that not a day went by in which he didn't want to join the mujahedeen, or holy warriors.

He also allegedly said, "The kuffar [infidels] are treacherous and understand only death and destruction."

The Crown alleges Mr. Khawaja, now 29, was involved in a trans-Atlantic conspiracy dating back to two years before his arrest in 2004. It is alleged that he met fellow extremists in London and learned at a training camp in Pakistan how to fire AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades. He is accused of trying to build a remote-controlled detonation device for a British cell that wanted to attack civilian targets in London, including possibly a night club and power grids.

Prosecutors said yesterday that Mr. Khawaja was so deep into the idea of holy war that even his attempts at marriage foundered after he told a prospective bride she had to understand he was "down with J" - or armed jihad, battles aimed at changing world governments or, at the very least, securing martyrdom for himself.

The Crown also said he was caught wiring funds to terrorist co-conspirators through a female friend selected because, as Mr. Khawaja wrote to her, "sisters don't get caught, brothers, if they send money, they get caught."

As the charges were read, the soft-spoken Mr. Khawaja, shaven and with long hair parted in the middle, said "not guilty" seven times, responding to each charge against him.

Members of his family, who have frequently accused the RCMP of building a racist case, sat in the courtroom in silence. Counterterrorism experts and international journalists looked on with interest, as the trial promises to provide insight into both radicalization and the incestuous nature of international jihadi schemes…

“Jihad”?  “Kuffars”?  “Mujahedeen”? Isn’t it, um, Islamophobic to mention such things? Won’t it just make the disaffected young lads even angrier, resulting in even more plots of this nature?

If I were Khurrum Awan, I’d give serious consideration to lodging a complaint with one or more of Canada’s anti-hate bodies, because this type of report is likely to expose Muslims to far more “Islamophobia” than anything ever penned by Mark Steyn.

Posted by: scaramouche at 09:41 | link | comments (3)


Comments:
#1  24 June 2008 - 10:56
 
Ahem... with absolute immodesty, I am responsible in no small part for any of Freeze's acuity to matters Islamic.

/don't ask
/my time was well-spent
Anonymous
#2  24 June 2008 - 11:25
 
Comments at the G&M site are now closed- but there are some VERY astute khufars commenting this morning, who clearly have a strong working knowledge of the Mohammedan belief system. This is heartening.
Anonymous
#3  25 June 2008 - 09:53
 
Essentially, there is "the truth" and there is "Canadian-Government-recognized truth".

What a conceit! But entirely consistent with the current pervasive sentiments of smugness and anti-Americanism among Canadians.

This all kinda makes one PINE for the pithiness of Jean Chretien who famously said something like: "When you got da proof and it's da good proof, whaddaysa got to prove?" - or something to that effect.

Bottom line - the truth is no defense in Canada anymore, even if you have evidence that the truth is true.

In other words, the real truth's "truthiness" is insufficient for Canadians. The real truth's "truthiness" must be measured, weighed, studied and examined IN CANADA BY CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SINECURES before it can be appropriately "branded" and labeled.

I suggest that LABELING TRUTH is the same as LIBELING TRUTH.

In Canada, the most important job of every politician and person in the public sphere is libeling "truth" as it is known and recognized elsewhere, it seems.

Kinda makes one nostalgic for the good old days when a rose was a rose was a rose...
Anonymous
Comments: