Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
CIC shakedown: Since the CIC doesn’t seem to be having much success in the “human rights” arena—it’s been shot down by two of the three bodies it complained to about Maclean’s Magazine’s “Islamophobia”—it is now warning that it may go elsewhere for redress—like to a real court of law. Here’s the CIC’s National Executive Director, imam Zijad Delic, lobbing threats in a letter to the Globe and Mail:
You referred to the Canadian Islamic Congress's complaints against Maclean's magazine as being "vexatious" (The Right To Offend - editorial, June 30). The Ontario Human Rights Commission did not share that opinion. It condemned Maclean's for its Islamophobic content and referred to the Maclean's article, the Future Belongs to Islam, as an "explicit expression of Islamophobia."
The federal commission's investigator stated: "An argument could be made that the material in the complaint bears some of the hallmarks of hate ... [in] that it does portray persons of the Muslim faith in a negative light based upon broad generalizations, and therefore may expose persons of the Muslim faith to hatred or contempt."
The Ontario commission has already condemned Maclean's; B.C.'s commission will make a decision on the merits of the case argued before it. The federal commission's decision not to hear the complaint will soon be appealed to the Federal Court.
One way or the other, the denigration of Muslims in the pages of Maclean's magazine will be brought to the attention of our legal system.
You do that, imam. You realize, of course, that unlike the B.C. ‘roo court that remains locked in deliberation over your complaint, a real court of law has stuff like discoveries, rules of evidence, a presumption of innocence and, oh, yeah, a regard for the truth. As such, it will likely prove to be far less receptive to your type of suit. You’ll also have to shoulder your own legal bills; I’m sure Ted Rogers (Maclean’s owner) can tell you how quickly those can add up.
The imam expatiates at greater length on the CIC site. As he sees it, it's those "angry right wingers" who are creating all the problems. It only they'd shut their pie holes and get with the "Islam is a relgious of peace" program, everything would be okey-dokey:
…Legitimate Muslim scholars have given their opinions on the matters the article talks about; however, the right-wing writers do not quote them. And they do not intend to do so either, for they have no interest in any knowledge and insight that will not serve their purpose of demonizing Islam and Muslims, both in Canada and across the globe.
We do not hear of these writers chasing after entire Christian denominations or Jewish faith groups because a few lunatics in their midst see the world as a one way street where only their signposts have any meaning. Similarly, Islam is not a monolithic faith either; we have no central authority from which to regulate and control what Muslims everywhere can say or do.
I'm sure that my Jewish and Christian friends can affirm the same relationship to our highest guiding Authority, regardless of how our human- run institutions function. Lunatics and extremists everywhere share the same lack of moral responsibility and self-awareness; they sanction only their own conduct and do not speak for you or for me.
But why then does this fundamental truth not hold in the case of any Muslim who also happens to be a proud Canadian? These angry right -wing writers prefer to see all Canadian Muslims as automatically guilty-by-association - that is, guilty until proven innocent - which runs totally counter to the logic and law of Canadian civil society. And this moral travesty seems these days to happen only to Muslims. We are being attacked by a hypocritical double standard that creates nothing but more confusion, conflict and anxiety, resulting in the unhealthy condition of having to be on guard and vigilant at all times.
Now if this unhappy situation was the article's intention all along, I have to admit it has succeeded. While I know that time will eventually redress this injustice, unopposed attacks by these writers will leave Canada as a whole vulnerable to even more social damage and confusion. For that reason, Muslims opted for legal avenues in order to counter discrimination and racism in a country we call our only home. We still hope that as Canadian citizens, we as Muslims can be accorded the same rights and protections as anyone else.
Such a naïve strategy totally misses the point. These writers conveniently forget that Canadian Muslims are an integral part of this country's social and historical fabric. We will not sit by passively while someone like him attacks our image and that of Canada itself.
Keep on writing, writers! But do not forget that honest and thinking Canadians will not allow themselves to be dragged into frivolous and demeaning debates. Please read the Bouchard-Taylor report on "reasonable accommodation" and better inform yourself on how mature and wise individuals really see the world in which you and I live.
Canadian Muslims can only hope that their actions and presence in Canada are much more respected by their fellow citizens than by certain media manipulators who masquerade as professional journalists.
Definition of "frivolous and demeaning debates": those that don't recognize Islam's perfection and unassailablity.
