Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
The Crown’s loose cannon: Much of the Crown’s case against the alleged Toronto jihadis revolves around the testimony of an imam who was paid a whack of dough to infiltrate a jihadi summer camp and snitch on the miscreants. As Dr. Phil might say, “How’s that workin’ for you, Crown? As the Crown would be forced to reply under the circumstances—the circumstances being that their star witness has turned out to be an untrustworthy buffoon—"Not so good." From the Globe and Mail:
An RCMP mole and star witness in a terrorism case defiantly warned prosecutors against attacking him at the coming trials of the 10 key "Toronto 18" suspects.
Police informant Mubin Shaikh said yesterday that he was "nobody's shill." Two weeks earlier, the Crown pounced on him at the trial of a youth on terrorism charges for contradicting statements he had made at a previous hearing.
His warning to prosecutors came outside a Toronto court minutes after he pleaded guilty to threatening a pair of 12-year-old girls in April, 2007, in his Etobicoke neighbourhood.
Mr. Shaikh, a devout Muslim who was paid $300,000 by the RCMP to infiltrate an alleged terrorist cell, said a group of preteens had "swarmed" his two children, and when the group did not back off at his request, he threatened two girls.
Mr. Shaikh pleaded guilty to telling the girls, "Do you know who I am? I'm going to chop off your legs!"
Outside the court, he said the pair had called him "Taliban boy" and "Osama bin Laden" based on his "overtly Islamic appearance" - a prayer cap, long beard and traditional clothing.
"I hear Osama bin Laden a lot, but I'm half the height of Osama bin Laden, so I don't know why people mistake me for him," he said.
The judge gave him a conditional discharge and two related charges of assault were dropped.
After leaving the courtroom, Mr. Shaikh said he was pleased the whole matter was behind him before the trial of the adults accused in the terrorism case begins.
"Everything's cleared, now I can just focus on the adult trial," he said.
In May, 2007, Dennis Edney, defence attorney for the alleged ringleader of the terrorist group, told The Globe and Mail he would consider using the threatening charges to question Mr. Shaikh's integrity as a witness.
Although he testified for five days at the trial of the youth, now 20 years old, last month, the incident was never raised in cross-examination.
The most aggressive questioning he faced came from Crown prosecutor John Neander, who grilled Mr. Shaikh about how much the youth knew about the alleged terrorist plot.
Mr. Shaikh also clarified some of his testimony from the terror trial, saying that the youth and other minors were asked to clean up shell casings and litter at an alleged terrorist training camp to hide evidence, but had been told by the leaders of the group that it was to protect wildlife.
He maintained throughout his testimony that the leaders had "nefarious" intentions, but the youth on trial was kept in the dark about the alleged plot. He said the cross-examination by the Crown caught him off guard.
"... I'm kept in a room and they don't tell me anything. I can't be expected to stick to some script," he said.
"I'm not bought and paid for," he said. "The only script I follow is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. If the Crown has a problem with that, they can take it up with God."…
Good thinking. At this stage it sounds like God may be the only one who can get their case back on track. Maybe next time authorities should think before taking up a “helpful” imam's offer to lend a hand.
