Anonymous on Value for money? ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Guys and gulls: Yes, it’s true. Hershell Ezrin, who, in his capacity as CEO of CIJA, is capo di tutti capi of Canada’s Israel and Jewish advocacy groups (the CJC, Wiesenthal, B’nai Brith, et al), has his very own blog. Yesterday, Hershell took time out from his busy day to opine on the Bambi ‘toon tumult. As Hershell sees it (and he sees it through the eyes of a former strategist for the Ontario Liberals), the hoopla erupted because certain people who harbour “quaint” ideas have been unable to come to terms with the fast pace of "change" and the wonderfulness of Fauxbama, who's his kind of guy (my bolds):
…methinks the outrage over Blitt’s cartoon is less an issue of genuine offense and more a case of “the lady doth protest too much.” It touches on a fear of the world changing much too fast for many Americans to keep up. The New Yorker cover ridicules an America that is being left behind, grappling with quaint notions of Muslims in regulation turban and white robe and militantly angry black women. And whether other countries have bread or fruit.
We, the children of a post-colonial world, don’t fear an Obama Planet. It has been our world for a long time. We’re happy to finally see the growing success of one of our own.
No, I didn’t mean a Muslim. Stop hyperventilating.
Will do, Hershell. Got my brown paper bag at hand. Breathing in and out. In and out.
There. Serenity returns. Now, could you please explain how a half-black Kansan/Hawaiian who spent his adulthood imbibing Black Liberation Theology from Louie Farakhan’s amigo at the Church of Abominate Ameri-KKKa and the Jooos is “one of our own”?
Yesterday, Hershell’s guy Bambi, whose foreign policy chops don't exactly rival Dean Acheson's, explained that radical Islam rose in response to American foreign policy and poverty (i.e. a paucity of "bread and fruit") in the Arab/Muslim world—in its own clueless way, rather a quaint notion. Robert Spencer, who’s likely not Hershell’s kind of guy, demolishes this fatally naïve idea in one fell swoop (my bolds):
On Sunday CNN aired an interview Barack Obama recently gave to Fareed Zakaria, in which the candidate expressed the opinion that Islamic jihad is a result of U.S. foreign policy failure. This is, of course, an assumption that he shares with virtually everyone of any influence in both parties. It is conventional wisdom that the United States, or the West in general, can make the global jihad problem go away by doing something that is not being done now, or by stopping doing something else. The possibility that the jihad might have arisen not as a reaction to actions of America and the West -- and cannot be ended by our actions, either, with the possible exception of overwhelming military and cultural force -- never seems to occur to anyone.
Zakaria asked Obama: “Do you believe, when looking at the world today, that Islamic extremism is the transcendent challenge of the 21st century?” In reply Obama spoke of “terrorism and groups that are resisting modernity,” as if Islamic jihadists were Amish with AK-47s, and avowed that “the fact that they can be driven into extremist ideologies, is one of the severe threats that we face.”
How can such people be driven into extremist ideologies? Obama explained that when he was a child Indonesia, “Indonesia was never the same culture as the Arab Middle East. The brand of Islam was always different.” And “around the world,” he said, “there was not the sense that Islam was inherently opposed to the West, or inherently opposed to modern life, or inherently opposed to universal traditions like rule of law.”
Of course, the problem in the world today is not an opposition of “Islam” to the “rule of law.” It is the resurgence of the Islamic supremacist ideology that has led to a global attempt to replace non-Muslim legal systems with Islamic sharia law -- an attempt that is making great headway in Europe and is also going on in the United States, both by violence and by stealth…
Oh, Robert, you’re such an alarmist. Try being more like Hershell Ezrin and Tammy Farber, chaps who embrace an “Obama planet” and who are building bridges with Muslims (our co-pebbles in Canada’s gloriously colourful multi-shmulti mosaic), and I can assure you, you’ll feel muuuch better.
