Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Tears for Omar: The videotape showing Omar Khadr being interrogated at Gitmo has struck a chord with some Canadians—as his lawyers knew it would when they decided to release it. Liberal leader wannabe Bob Rae, for one, is outraged that, at such a tender age (he was sixteen at the time) Omar had to endure such dreadful abuse.
In reality, as Stephen Brown and Jacob Laksin write in FrontPage Magazine, he was subjected to nothing of the kind:
...So far from brutalizing him, Khadr’s interrogator repeatedly tries to calm and reassure the detainee. Seeing that he’s stressed out, the interrogator urges Khadr to take a break ("take a few minutes to relax a bit"). Later in the video, he offers him –gasp! – a chocolate bar. On the whole, it looks more like a therapy session than an interrogation, let alone a violation of international law.
Indeed, Khadr has been treated exceptionally well during his residency at Guantanamo. For starters, the fact that he survived at all is a credit to the American military. In Afghanistan, Khadr had planted roadside bombs to kill coalition troops. Nonetheless, he was nursed back to health by military doctors who attended to the near-fatal wounds he suffered while trying to kill American servicemen. No legal or medical rights have been denied him, and Khadr’s first two lawyers, whom he dismissed, were university law professors. Now housed in the least restricted part of Guantanamo, he has been allowed to read – according to former Gitmo chaplain James Yee, Khadr was particularly delighted to receive Disney picture books – and has even memorized the Koran. In this environment, to portray Khadr as a victim of military child abuse is to distort the facts beyond recognition.
And that is precisely what Khadr’s defenders have done. It is fair to say that no Guantanamo detainee has aroused as much misplaced sympathy as the 21-year-old Islamist. Whether in the form of books weeping over “Guantanamo’s child,” or this week’s mendacious video stunt, the save-Khadr campaign goes on. If there is any good news to emerge from these unedifying proceedings it is that, for the time being at least, Khadr himself is staying right where he is.
What we have here is another opportunity for Harper’s opponents to try to score some political points against him. Doing so by turning Omar and his Taliban mama into figures of sympathy, though, has to represent a new low in Canadian politics.
