Anonymous on Value for money? ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
On hatred, the homeless and HRCs: Even though I'm en vacance, I've been ruminating about that piece in the National Post yesterday revealing that homeless people in Toronto have been flogging a newspaper full of antisemitic crapola. The old Scaramouche,the one who didn't know wasn't fully up on the infamy of the the anti-hate industry and how seriously it compromised our freedom, might have said and done what the CJC has done--i.e. worried about the hatred, lodged a complaint with an HRC and waited for the thought cops and/or 'roos to, at some point, depending on how quickly it got to it (in Ezra Levant's case, it took a whopping 900 days), either dismiss the matter or adjudicate it in a "quasi-judicial" framework, and mete out the requisite punishment to the offender. At the end of which there would be high fives all around and immense satisfaction that another hater had been squashed, and Canadian Jews have been made "safe".
That's the old Scaramouche. The new Scaramouche says, "Hold on a minute. In the annals of Judenhass, this has to be one of the most pathetic stories ever. Here you have a pathetic old cancer-ridden Jew-hater who's in the grip of the same old pathetic delusions about "the Jews" controlling the global monetary supply pushing that line in pathetic "newspaper" flogged on downtown street corners by pathetic homeless people. Will I as a Jew feel "safer" if the whole sorry lot of them are "punished" by commissar Barbara Hall's wacky, Orwellian "court"? Not on your life."
You see, it's not the free floating Judenhass that alarms me--the pathetic chatter in the pathetic Stormfront chat rooms that Tammy and Co. labour so hard to shut down. As a student of history I have come to understand that free floating hatred is a permanent feature, a given given Judaism's place in the pecking order of monotheism. The free floating hatred--that's everywhere, all the time. (One example: recently, my 10-year-old son was told by some kids at the yacht club where we have our modest sail boat that they could tell he was Jewish because he "had a Jewish nose." The thing is, my son is adopted, and has the button-nose of his Kentucky forebears. Obviously, these kids had heard that "the Jews" are noted for their probosci--even, it seems, the Jews who don't have even a trace of Jewish blood in them.) It's the Judenhass that's tied to political agenda we have to worry about; the hatred on display in Arab newspapers that's tied to an agenda of obliterating the Jewish state in the same way that the hatred in Nazi newspapers was tied to an agenda of liquidating the Jews of Europe.
That being said, how sad is it that the only way a homeless person can make an "honest" buck is by purveying this tommyrot? And why has it taken so long for the contents of this loathesome rag to be exposed?
As well, one must note the disparity in the way Commissar Hall reacted to this instance of hatred versus her reaction to the case that got away--Mark Steyn and Maclean's. Babsy, as you'll recall, never got to adjudicate that matter since, alas, it didn't fall within her purview. Deprived of the opportunity to conduct a B.C.-style show trial, she worked herself up into a frenzied--one might even say hysterical--state, declaring Steyn and Maclean's "guilty" of flagrant "xenophobia" and "Islamophobia". Compare that to her reaction to the homeless rag, which really is vile and hateful (as opposed to the Maclean's pieces, which were truthful about, albeit criticical of, the jihad). Babsy's low-key reply: Ho hum; no biggie; wake me up when someone says something nasty about a Muslim so's I can spring into action.
Dare we call that the commissar's "disproportionate response"?
