Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
One more before I go: Don't miss this “Islamophobic” report from the Daily Mail about the hard-to-nail-down provenance of potential terrorists:
Potential Islamist terrorists in Britain are not religious extremists or illegal immigrants, a leaked MI5 report warns.
The internal study of hundreds of known and suspected radicals says it is difficult to identify those most likely to commit atrocities as they often have well-paid jobs and families and are 'demographically unremarkable'.
The Security Service report concludes that the vast majority are British nationals or in the country legally.
Slipping under the radar: The July 7 bombers arrive at Luton station to head for London for their suicide attacks. Future terrorists may be no easier to identify, MI5 warns
It says half are born here. The rest includes people who originally came to study or to join family or for economic reasons, as well as asylum-seekers who had fled oppressive regimes or violence. Many of these only became radicalised years after arriving.
Very few have come from highly religious households and most only practise their faith occasionally. The proportion of converts is above average.
Some are even known to have taken drugs, drunk alcohol and visited prostitutes.
But they are not especially prone to mental health problems or pathological personality traits.
They come from ethnic backgrounds as diverse as Pakistani, Middle Eastern and Caucasian.
Most have become radicalised in their early to mid-20s but a significant minority have not done so until later. Those over 30 are just as likely to have a wife and children as to be loners with no ties.
Radical clerics are also playing less of a role now in radicalising future terrorists, according to the 'restricted' briefing note, published in the Guardian today.
The research was carried out by the security service's behavioural science unit and involved analysis of several hundred people linked to violent extremism through activities ranging from fundraising to planning suicide bombings in Britain.
Overall they are 'a diverse collection of individuals, fitting no single demographic profile, nor do they all follow a typical pathway to violent extremism', the study says.
In other words, they emanate from what you could call "a broad strata of society." And here's the impossible to swallow kicker:
MI5 praises mainstream Islam, stating there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.
Riiiight.
