...born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad

About me

User: scaramouche
Irreverent, contrarian, delighted to be out of synch with the zeitgeist, I depend on my sense of humour (such as it is) to keep me sane in this wacky world.

  • Contact me
  • My profile
  • Linkme

Counter

visited *loading* times

Thursday, 02 October 2008

A modest proposal: How’s this for an idea whose time will never come—a regional “alliance” between Turkey, Israel, the Arabs and Iran? The idea is being floated by an, er, imaginative Arab. From AFP via Arab News:

DUBAI: The foreign minister of Bahrain has called for the creation of a regional grouping of Arab states with historic foe Israel, as well as Iran and Turkey, a newspaper reported yesterday.

“Israel, Iran, Turkey and Arab states should sit together in one organization,” Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmad Al-Khalifa was quoted in the pan-Arab daily Al-Hayat as saying.

“Aren’t we all members of a global organization called the United Nations? Why not (come together) on a regional basis? This is the only way to solve our problems. There’s no other way to solve them, now or in 200 years.”

The paper, which interviewed the Bahraini chief diplomat in New York, said he had proposed the establishment of a regional bloc in a speech to the UN General Assembly.

The Gulf state is a major ally of the United States and has a free trade agreement with Washington. It also hosts the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet.

Bahrain’s Crown Prince Sheikh Salman bin Hamad Al-Khalifa, met Israeli officials during World Economic Forum summits in 2000 and 2003, while Sheikh Khaled met Israeli counterpart Tzipi Livni at the UN last year.

But political groupings in Bahrain resist any attempt at normalization of ties with Israel. Only two Arab countries — Egypt and Jordan — have full-fledged peace treaties with Israel. Qatar is one of a handful of Arab countries to maintain political contacts with the Jewish state.

Forging ties with Israel without a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is generally unpopular among ordinary Arabs. “Why don’t we sit together even if we disagree, even if we don’t recognize each other? Let’s be in a single organization in order to overcome the difficult stage through which the Middle East is passing — a stage that remains hostage to the past,” Sheikh Khaled said, referring to the decades-old Arab-Israeli conflict.

Told that his proposal might be perceived by some as a “dream” since it was hard to see hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sitting alongside Israel, Sheikh Khaled said: “If this is perceived as a dream, well, many dreams have become reality.”

Uh, I can see another impediment to the plan—aside from the problem of a “hard-line” Iran, that is: Israel, with good reason, is likely to be suspicious that its historic foes with allow it to retain its Jewish character and thus be the one kafir state among all the believers. Apart from that, it’s exactly the kind of genius that could earn the foreign minister one of those shiny Nobel Peace Prizes.

Posted by: scaramouche at 18:11 | link | comments

Comments: