...born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad

About me

User: scaramouche
Irreverent, contrarian, delighted to be out of synch with the zeitgeist, I depend on my sense of humour (such as it is) to keep me sane in this wacky world.

  • Contact me
  • My profile
  • Linkme

Counter

visited *loading* times

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

Troofer triumphant: Jonathan Kay’s concession that he feels daunted by the mountain of data assembled by those who believe someone other than al Qaeda (the Jews, the CIA, the Mossad, the FBI, the Trilateral Commission, Dick Cheney, the Jews, etc.) is behind 9/11 has prompted this “skeptic” to come out and have a good crow:

As Jonathan Kay notes, 9/11 skeptics have done their homework and what they read in the "official explanation for the 9/11 attacks" is what makes them skeptical. It's good to hear that Mr. Kay will be reading the 9/11 Commission Report, but it is obvious that he starts with a preconception when he calls the Popular Mechanics magazine report "authoritative" without having read it.

This is a good time to remember Mahatma Gandhi's words: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." With 39% of Canadians skeptical about the official version of 9/11, a win (full disclosure) for skeptics is on the horizon.

T. Trei, Toronto.

It is also a good time to remember the words of the Czarist police who confabulated the “troofer” tract of its day, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: “The Jooos did it!” And let’s not forget the words of Mahatma Gandhi who, during the early going of what would become the Holocaust (a catastrophe inspired in no small measure by that troofer tract), urged the Jews to lie down and die, since “pacifism” is always better than combat.

Bearing that in mind, I think we can safely discount the “sceptics” (“true believers,” more like), no matter how much “proof” they manage to amass.

And anyway, I know for a fact that the imam with the ugly forehead icky planned the whole thing on a grassy knoll.

Posted by: scaramouche at 10:04 | link | comments (1)


Comments:
#1  29 October 2008 - 12:41
 
How could he have not read the PM analysis of 9/11? It is thorough, unchallenged by any lettered authority- and conclusive.
Anonymous
Comments: