Anonymous on Value for money? ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Troofer triumphant: Jonathan Kay’s concession that he feels daunted by the mountain of data assembled by those who believe someone other than al Qaeda (the Jews, the CIA, the Mossad, the FBI, the Trilateral Commission, Dick Cheney, the Jews, etc.) is behind 9/11 has prompted this “skeptic” to come out and have a good crow:
As Jonathan Kay notes, 9/11 skeptics have done their homework and what they read in the "official explanation for the 9/11 attacks" is what makes them skeptical. It's good to hear that Mr. Kay will be reading the 9/11 Commission Report, but it is obvious that he starts with a preconception when he calls the Popular Mechanics magazine report "authoritative" without having read it.
This is a good time to remember Mahatma Gandhi's words: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." With 39% of Canadians skeptical about the official version of 9/11, a win (full disclosure) for skeptics is on the horizon.
T. Trei, Toronto.
It is also a good time to remember the words of the Czarist police who confabulated the “troofer” tract of its day, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: “The Jooos did it!” And let’s not forget the words of Mahatma Gandhi who, during the early going of what would become the Holocaust (a catastrophe inspired in no small measure by that troofer tract), urged the Jews to lie down and die, since “pacifism” is always better than combat.
Bearing that in mind, I think we can safely discount the “sceptics” (“true believers,” more like), no matter how much “proof” they manage to amass.
And anyway, I know for a fact that the imam with the ugly forehead icky planned the whole thing on a grassy knoll.
