Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on In the same vein ...
Anonymous on Et tu, FOX?: ...
scaramouche on Cramming ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
Anonymous on Cramming ...
Anonymous on There’s a ...
Anonymous on On Hasan the ...
scaramouche on Mail call: A ...
Anonymous on Hold me closer, ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Lumpy, Grumpy and Frumpy
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
Steyn Online
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Who’s on first?: There days you can count the pro-censorship boosters on your fingers. Let’s see, there’s the CIC, the BB, Wiesenthal, that meeskite from the Calgary Herald and, oh, yeah, the Abbott and Costello of Canadian censorship, Bernie “Bud” Farber and Harpoon “Lou” Siddiqui.
The slimmer, more hirsute half of the team—the one who writes twice weekly for the Toronto Star—has yet another “yeah, censorship!” piece in today’s paper. Should you care to, you can read it here.
And here’s my response:
Haroon Siddiqui claims it’s “ironic” that the “Harper Tories” have been “neutering the human rights tribunal,” thereby alienating “mainstream” Jewry, a community they have supposedly long courted.
But I see a far bigger irony—the irony of a columnist writing for a large Canadian daily constantly beating the drum for state censorship.
Doesn’t Siddiqui realize that, when censors are handed the power to decide what can and cannot be said largely on the basis of whether someone’s feelings have been “hurt,” they could just as easily decide that he no longer gets to speak?
For instance, my feelings have certainly been hurt by false assertions about “Harper Tories” “riding the anti-Islamic bandwagon” (a bandwagon that exists solely in Siddiqui’s imagination), and “neutering the human rights tribunal” (it has done no such thing and, in fact, Prof. Richard Moon, who, in his report called for anti-hate speech provisions to be struck down, was appointed by the Canadian Human Rights Commission). However, I would never think to bring action against anyone for hurting my feelings, because I believe with every fibre of my being that, in a democracy, bureaucrats have no business being the arbiters of “hurt feelings,” and that a society cannot remain free if “feelings” are allowed to trump free speech.
I’m not alone in that belief. Indeed, there is growing support, on both the Left and the Right, to restore Canadians’ free expression—one of four fundamental freedoms enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Ironically, on this particular issue, it is now Siddiqui and a handful of organizations such as the Canadian Islamic Congress and the Canadian Jewish Congress who find themselves out of step with the “mainstream”.

